<![CDATA[SUSTAINABLE - Agrarian Energy]]>Thu, 09 May 2024 02:40:19 -0700Weebly<![CDATA[Farmers gonna farm]]>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 23:32:42 GMThttp://2506422917.ca/aylesbury-sk/farmers-gonna-farmFarming is in our blood, but you won't find this livestock running around loose on the pasture.
The happy couple are prolific progenitors, and there is no law against child labour in the bug world. Millions of little workers made out of garbage!
]]>
<![CDATA[Land application of biosolids]]>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 12:56:35 GMThttp://2506422917.ca/aylesbury-sk/land-application-of-biosolidsThere is a quick way to determine if land application of biosolids is a good idea. Would you dump it on your garden? The current controversy around biosolids on Vancouver Island is nearly unbelievable. In what alternate universe would the individuals responsible even consider doing that to their garden?

This letter does a good job of summarizing the problem.

Although as a pre-process value add that can be plugged in upstream to any solution, our "insects as energy" biotech doesn't even get past the gate-keepers in a closed shop so tightly sealed off that we can not even get the contact information for the short-listed proponents that have been invited to respond to the upcoming RFP.

We will leave out the contact information as a courtesy, but this is the response from the CRD:

"apologies for the delay getting back to you. After discussing internally, I don’t think it is appropriate for me to be passing along contract information that we received as part of the RFEOI process to third parties.
 
I’m sure the short-listed companies have appropriate contact information up on their web-pages." 



]]>
<![CDATA[300 acre native pasture with water available for 2024]]>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 13:50:00 GMThttp://2506422917.ca/aylesbury-sk/300-acre-native-pasture-with-water-available-for-2024
Nearly 300 acres of fair-good native pasture available for 2024 cow/calf operation.
  • Offers currently at $1.50/unit/day + flat $2500 fence depreciation surcharge (effective average $1.55/unit day)
  • Bids close May 17 following pasture condition assessment
  • Location is in the Canada-Saskatchewan Feed Program eligibility area
  • No sub-lease - cattle owners only
  • New 4 wire fence 4-5 posts 2023
  • Cross fenced with neighbour pasture 200 acres our side - 100 acres neighbour
  • Neighbour part of the deal
  • Renter responsible for herd supervision, minerals & fence maintenance
  • Insurance certificate required
  • Arm River runs through
  • Good direct highway access to Hwy 11
  • Fenced loading corral
  • Season third week July - Oct 1, stocking rate dependent on precipitation & pasture condition.
  • Historically supported 40 – 55 pair ~ 72 days:
  • 3978 unit/days 2020
  • 2833 unit/days 2021
  • 3796 unit/days 2022
  • 3780 unit days 2023
  • Prefer more cows less days.
  • We had >150 pair + a few bulls and hamburger cows in for a few weeks 2023.
  • No bare spots, good litter cover, good bush shade
May 2023 Google Street View here:

Catches precipitation anomaly with historically more rain than surrounding areas. Canada drought monitor
]]>
<![CDATA[Land disposal of biosolids]]>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 13:16:25 GMThttp://2506422917.ca/aylesbury-sk/land-disposal-of-biosolidsA good metric by which to evaluate public policy for waste disposal is; would you dump it on your garden?

​It defies logical explanation that waste too toxic to be dumped in the ocean would then be ok to dump on land. Take that practice out 50 or 100 years with increasing population density. It's self-evident that sewage sludge should not be disposed of anywhere that it can not be fixed in place and even then, without treatment to render it inert.

Anaerobic digestion combined with thermal processing such as pyrolysis and gasification have proven to be expensive and technically problematic, particularly for smaller communities that can not spread the infrastructure costs across a large population.

We think we our "insects as energy" solution is the game-changer. It works for kitchen waste on the front end. Why not sewage waste, on the back end? 
]]>
<![CDATA[Landfilling biosolids]]>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:30:44 GMThttp://2506422917.ca/aylesbury-sk/landfilling-biosolids
It's a difficult challenge to overcome the "optics" necessary to bring forward a proposal in an infrastructure space such as waste management. The gatekeepers on government staff look at "organizational capacity," a purely superficial consideration built largely on BS that tends to direct RFP's for solutions to existing organizations that function a lot like government, and do not even maintain a large local footprint. They will typically staff a local office with an over-worked and underpaid rep, tied back to a parent organization that is not even Canadian.

That practice structurally excludes innovation.

Our "insects as energy" solution is a case-study in point. It was obvious from the outset that shipping  the Class A biosolids from the CRD plant for consumption in the LaFarge cement plant on the mainland was not only CO2e positive, but not fault tolerant and it was going to be a fail. We said so at the time. It did, and now biosolids are being landfilled, with a predictable public push-back.

This time around maybe we can convince someone that the skill set developed on a farm in financing,  building and operating industrial process equipment that handles large volume high-tonnage grain, and raising and transporting livestock to market is fully transferable to a waste management infrastructure project that is basically a farm.

We don't need to be a multi-national.
]]>
<![CDATA[Water or lack thereof]]>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 14:25:23 GMThttp://2506422917.ca/aylesbury-sk/water-or-lack-thereofThe relationship between water and fixing soil carbon is nowhere so evident as when water is absent. Highway infrastructure projects have the potential to impact riparian areas, and project planning needs to be alive to this. The Saskatchewan Prairie Resilience Strategy has this to say: Our water
strategy assesses past drought events, identifies where floods are most likely to happen and how severe they might be, and conducts continued assessment of water resources. This knowledge guides planning for infrastructure such as roads and highways as well as land use policies.


A recent highways project to divert water from our pasture and drain it downstream into a ditch is a case-in-point of the granular level of implementation necessary if the ambitions of the climate change strategy is to have any efficacy. These minor projects can not be assumed to be insignificant, as they drive the organizational cultural shift out of the silo of what is strictly efficient for Highways to anticipate collateral impacts.

Water may be a liability for Highways, but it is the life-blood of our pasture and draining it off as waste to be dumped into a ditch is not acceptable.
Picture
This
Picture
Not this
Here is a playlist of water conditions on the pasture.
]]>
<![CDATA[Nature is a free machine]]>Thu, 14 Apr 2022 15:27:41 GMThttp://2506422917.ca/aylesbury-sk/nature-is-a-free-machineWe've played around with biochar and a number of other business models around carbon and they all add up to capital intensive high risk with no clear cash return on investment. Capital is risk averse, it's hard to get and easy to lose, so any complicated model is a fail.

Then this came on our radar. Is the investment recoverable in beef $? If not, can we subsidize it through the amenity contribution required by approving authorities for development in BC? We're going to find out.
]]>
<![CDATA[Transporting carbon from BC development to Sk prairie]]>Tue, 01 Feb 2022 15:34:44 GMThttp://2506422917.ca/aylesbury-sk/transporting-carbon-from-bc-development-to-sk-prairieAs we begin the development of our Ragged Mountain project the concept of carbon off-set for the development is top of mind. Atmospheric CO2 pumped into non-arable Saskatchewan farmland provides the transport mechanism to port the carbon footprint of development in BC and sequester it in Saskatchewan prairie. How? Just buy it and impose grazing management on it, subsidized with the carbon budget of BC development. Real estate has always been a good buy & hold investment, grain farmers have no use for non-arable land, and people still prefer grass fed meat.

The rationale is here.
]]>
<![CDATA[Prescribed burn]]>Sun, 30 Jan 2022 14:43:34 GMThttp://2506422917.ca/aylesbury-sk/prescribed-burnGiven the risk associated with wildfire, why would anyone start a fire on purpose? 
Fire has always been a natural feature of the prairie landscape, and a controlled burn is one of the most effective ways to avoid the massive destruction of uncontrollable wildfire. It's also one of the only feasible ways to control encroachment of woody plants into grassland during drought conditions. Species like sage will out-compete native forage species and cattle will not eat them, which increases forage demand on the remaining areas of grassland. A controlled burn will not only maintain the forage productivity of the range, it will mitigate the potential for wildfire by reducing the available fuel load. 
]]>
<![CDATA[2021 was a good year]]>Fri, 31 Dec 2021 15:03:12 GMThttp://2506422917.ca/aylesbury-sk/2021-was-a-good-year2021 brought us our Aylesbury, Saskatchewan project, nearly 200 acres of range located on the Louis Riel Trail. Looking back, this is developing into one of the most personally satisfying projects in our portfolio. 
A lot of things were brought into focus, but as 2021 closes, and with nearly two months spent on site, one has our attention more than others - water.
There is plenty of press on what is going on, but there is nothing quite like feeling it by being there, and it's nothing short of remarkable how much of the Amazon looks exactly like Saskatchewan.
One of the more enjoyable things is a walk back through history to the Crown grant, as we build a property information portfolio. 
]]>