A good metric by which to evaluate public policy for waste disposal is; would you dump it on your garden?
It defies logical explanation that waste too toxic to be dumped in the ocean would then be ok to dump on land. Take that practice out 50 or 100 years with increasing population density. It's self-evident that sewage sludge should not be disposed of anywhere that it can not be fixed in place and even then, without treatment to render it inert. Anaerobic digestion combined with thermal processing such as pyrolysis and gasification have proven to be expensive and technically problematic, particularly for smaller communities that can not spread the infrastructure costs across a large population. We think we our "insects as energy" solution is the game-changer. It works for kitchen waste on the front end. Why not sewage waste, on the back end?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Where the heck is Aylesbury, Saskatchewan?Archives
April 2024
Categories |